Ours is a sobering reality that we can expect to see and hear only bad news whenever we tune in to current events broadcasts. But it would be incredibly ignorant to deny that over the past few years — and particularly the last few months — the news has grown increasingly grim. Although I hesitate to introduce politicizing material, in the United States we are experiencing frightening levels of civil unrest stoked by concerns over terrorism, immigration policies, police brutality, racial tensions, gun violence, economic turmoil, and of course the tremendously polarizing — and I daresay pessimistic — 2016 presidential election. I will not trouble with citing specific instances, as they are too many to list. (If any of this sounds unfamiliar to you, would you kindly give me directions to the mammoth rock under which you have been living?) This volatile combination of confusion, misunderstanding, disagreement, anger, and vengeance has coalesced into a brand of hatred that is forced to find expression in displays of escalating intensity and greater tragedy, a hatred that has poisoned the proverbial air we breathe.
I recently read an (old) report in Chemical & Engineering News marking the 100-year anniversary of the first successful deployment of poison gas as a weapon of mass destruction. While by far not the first act of chemical warfare in history, the April 22, 1915 release of chlorine gas on woefully unprepared Allied troops entrenched near Ypres, Belgium claimed in excess of 8100 casualties — of which over 1100 were fatalities — and set a lethal precedent for armies and regimes to follow. In addition to tear gases, phosgene, and diphosgene, the debilitating blistering agent known as mustard gas was uniquely dangerous in that it had a delayed effect, which meant that soldiers could unknowingly contaminate their camps upon return from the battlefield. Chemical agents were responsible for relatively few WWI fatalities — less than 1% — but they produced grisly images of human (and ecological) suffering. These poison gases made inhospitable the spaces they occupied, not unlike the animosity which plagues our present social climate...
Perhaps the archetypal symbols of this chemical warfare are the gas masks worn by infantryman (and their animal counterparts), like those shown above. It is a fear-invoking image, a horrifying deformation of the human countenance (one that, disappointingly, seems to have been romanticized in the steampunk culture). And rightly so, as it is a reminder of the terrible things that armies introduced to humanity to yield devastating results. Moreover, the masks were quite uncomfortable. But they served as necessary protection, protection that enabled soldiers to overcome the hazards of this new shade of warfare. Is it surprising, then, that people would require protection against the evil and hatred which permeates our present lives?
![]() |
American WWI soldiers donning gas masks |
Perhaps the archetypal symbols of this chemical warfare are the gas masks worn by infantryman (and their animal counterparts), like those shown above. It is a fear-invoking image, a horrifying deformation of the human countenance (one that, disappointingly, seems to have been romanticized in the steampunk culture). And rightly so, as it is a reminder of the terrible things that armies introduced to humanity to yield devastating results. Moreover, the masks were quite uncomfortable. But they served as necessary protection, protection that enabled soldiers to overcome the hazards of this new shade of warfare. Is it surprising, then, that people would require protection against the evil and hatred which permeates our present lives?
![]() |
A typical medieval plague doctor costume |
I remember thinking a while back how strikingly similar (and visually
unsettling) the gas masks worn by WWI infantryman were to the masks worn
by plague doctors during the Middle Ages. In that time, the miasma theory of disease
was predicated on the belief that illness was propagated by the
movement of miasma or "bad (or night) air" generated by the decay of organic
matter. To prevent the transmission of disease, doctors placed scented
substances [including ambergris lemon balm, mint leaves, camphor,
cloves, laudanum, myrrh(!), rose petals, and storax] and straw as a
filter in the cone nose. Consequently, these doctors sought to keep out
the "bad air" by filtering it and replacing it with other scents.
Consider further how modern doctors and other medical professionals — who have come to adopt the germ theory of disease — use appropriate facial protection when treating patients. Or how firefighters wear oxygen masks to brave the cocktail of harmful substances they encounter at structure fires. Although the everyman is less likely to encounter these physical hazards, I very much believe that the aura of hatred which contaminates our goodwill as human beings is actively choking us out. So what is our protection?
The answer seems obvious to me: the Word of God. Now, I do not mean that holding a sacred book to one's mouth and nose will shield a person from some kind of "miasma." Instead, it is in the living out of the Word, through acts of love and mercy, that we guard our hearts against the "wickedness and snares of the Devil" (from the Prayer to Saint Michael the Archangel) and in so doing can work to dispel that air of evil. In taking in the "breath of life" (see Genesis 2:7), a life force free of the corruption of human sinfulness, we are strengthened by God's grace to triumph over the toxic and soul-killing enmity that threatens to suffocate us all.
It should be said, this "mask of protection" is not an easy one to wear. To have the courage to stand against the rising tide sets one apart and can be off-putting (read: frightening) for those who have decided to follow the current. Consequently, this Christian bravery can be burdensome, and there are no doubt times that we will desire to wrench it off and embrace the alluring ease of evil. In my opinion, this is one of the great paradoxes of our faith: That we are promised an "easy yoke" (Matthew 11:30) but must be willing to "take up [our] cross" (Matthew 16:24). Yet, infinitely more unbearable is the burden of hate that will bury us in the end.
I proffer these two musical pieces for reflection, one more serene and the other (from my favorite Christian band) more impassioned:
From both, we see that it is only the sweetness of God's love that can fill our spirit with true goodness. If we ignore that love, we fall. But if we immerse ourselves in it, we become the greatest possible versions of ourselves. It is then our Christian duty, as vessels of God's love, to go forth and "breathe" new life into a diseased world. And in the fullness of time, with fervent hope, we will be able to remove our masks and breathe forever freely.